60 Seconds Summary

• • If we don’t get our Carbon or Green House Gas emissions down to zero by 2030 we’re heading for a dangerous planet Earth with millions of deaths, mass extinctions, flooded cities, more extreme heat and flooding and cold, polluted oceans, food scarcity, and so probably a lot of civil unrest.
  • The draft RBWM Climate Strategy seems unambitious in that;
    • It doesn’t target 2030 to reach net-zero carbon or GHG emissions
    • It doesn’t address Climate Change Resilience i.e. the changes needed to buildings and services due to the levels of extreme weather that are guaranteed to occur to protect residents
    • It is not clear on its scope i.e. what and who the strategy will be applied to
    • Its methodology should guarantee openness & collaboration, and measurement metrics
  • Much more work needs to be done to improve it and, pressure is needed from residents to council to bring the final report and actions up to the level of excellence that we and future generations would demand of us.
  • There now follows a period of consultation where you can have your say before the report is finalised; more information to follow shortly

DON’T PANIC
Next week, I will publish guidance on how YOU CAN PERSONALLY REACH NET ZERO CARBON EMISSIONS quickly, and how you can help others, and encourage the Government and Council to get there quickly as well. Let’s work at this together. We’re all in the same boat.

Dear (witheld)

I have finally got my head around the strategy paper presented, notwithstanding my overview comments in my recent emails, especially the email dated 14 May 2020 14:05.

None of my comments detract from the work done already, which needed to be done, however one approaches writing such a strategy and the eventual tactics and actions.

It is not my intention to offend anyone, please be assured of that; we all want the same thing, to protect the future wellbeing of our children and grandchildren and the biosphere; perhaps it’s just a matter of approach and style. 

Here are my thoughts, en masse, and unrefined.

I am not going to comment on the Foreword, though I do agree with the views of the RBWM Climate Emergency Coalition.

1. Objectives

1. • We need to clearly state the objectives, with each key objective having its own clause
   • At a minimum, this should include

1. 2. • Achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, with a stretch target of zero emissions by 2030
      • Enhancing biodiversity and habitat creation for all appropriate, and native species
      • Assessing the impact of Climate Change and building resilience for all areas under the control of RBWM

2. Scope

2. • We should also clearly note the scope of each area, which should be

2. 1. • Own assets, JVCs, and all contracts and contractors
      • This should be reflected in the Action plan

2. • I have no particular view on how or where we note our aims to facilitate all residents, whether businesses or citizens, achieving the same objectives.

3. Baselines should be noted for each of the items noted in 2.7, 2.8, and 2.9
4. As a quick point, you have noted the correct requirement to “reduce consumption” under

4. • Circular Economy in 3.4, and
   • Renewable Energy in 3.13
   • Please ensure consistency here

5. As a comment on our four themes, based on detailed studies and modeling by the Centre For Alternative Technology (CAT), our themes contribute the following % of carbon emissions, and so priority and the focus for the Zero-carbon objective should be considered

5. • Circular Economy – 4%
   • Renewable energy – 40%
   • Natural capital – negative %
   • Sustainable mobility – 40%

6. For each theme, a baseline study needs to be conducted so we can see where we are starting from and can use the same evaluation methodologies to assess future projects. We must state the baseline figures now
7. The key to enhancing all biodiversity is habitat creation, and land use

7. • We should ensure that this is reflected in our strategy, and SPD, which would include no development on greenbelt land

8. I would suggest that we also add Net Zero carbon transport solutions for RBWM, staff, contractors, and public transport by 2050, with a stretch target of 2030
9. In relation to the Action plans, the measure of success has to be stated in Carbon emission equivalents for all themes, and also biodiversity indicators, including the Green Infrastructure, and Blue Infrastructure indicators that we will be creating with Natural England
10. Reduction of energy demand target should be 60%, in keeping with the methodology of CAT, though how you stage that over each periodic review needs thinking about
11. The SPD MUST include net-zero Carbon targets, Biodiversity/Habitat creation goals, and Climate Change resilience standards for all new build and also retrofits/planning permissions
12. We must lobby government hard for a range of laws and funds to help achieve our objectives
13. Under Natural Capital, I suggest that we acknowledge that we don’t know, and set a target to work with a local University, which demonstrates excellence in this field, to develop information and understanding to

13. • Inform our SPD (Supplementary Planning Document as part of the Borough Local Plan guidance for planners)
    • Create 5 yearly Biodiversity Action Plans for the Borough

14. Given that Transport generates 40% of Carbon emissions, I suggest that we include

14. • a target to decarbonize all transport solutions under our ownership or influence.
    • Introduce a low pollution zone over the entire Borough

15. All reports and decisions taken, whether presented to Council for approval or not, must report on the effect of the proposed decisions on each of the objectives including carbon emissions, biodiversity targets, climate change resilience
16. I can see no commitment to collaborate, deeply consult, review and report on best practice,
17. Finally, it is my firm view that if you train our officers to understand clearly the concepts behind carbon measurement and biodiversity enhancement, it is they who will drive the proves and generate ideas to achieve our objectives

17. • I would appreciate a clear comment to that effect
    • Please also, advise which officers contributed suggestions which were incorporated into the presented strategy

Based on these comments, I would ask you to either;

1. Delay the publication of the strategy so we can get together and thrash these issue out with the Climate Action Networks, or
2. Include the clause I previously stated of, “We will continue to develop the objectives, scope, and methodology to ensure that the strategy facilitates the highest levels of effectiveness and achievement.” or
3. Note a caveat beside my name that says, “The report has a great many merits but I have concerns about the range and clarity of the objectives, and the content and openness of the methodology. “